By John Collins Rudolf Woody Tasch says we need to put the brakes on our investment portfolios. Don't worry, though: He still has a way for...
We have to take some of our money and invest it close to home in local food systems.What Tasch proposes as an alternative is a series of regional financial hubs to connect individuals and institutions to local food producers in need of capital. Investments would earn modestly, in the low-to-mid single digits, yet they would also yield less traditional-but perhaps no less valuable-returns. Sustainable farming techniques would reduce pollution and restore soil fertility, while revenues from small farms would circulate locally, enhancing community stability. But food is only the beginning. Ultimately, these investment hubs could serve local manufacturing enterprises and other sustainable industries.While still rare, a few models for this type of financial intermediary already exist around the country. Since 1985, Philadelphia's Reinvestment Fund has delivered $893 million in capital to 2,480 local housing, renewable energy, arts, education, and small business projects. Its successes include building 11,800 affordable homes and financing nearly one gigawatt in renewable energy projects, as well as creating more than 40,000 small business jobs. In concert with the Food Trust, another Philadelphia nonprofit, the Reinvestment Fund has also brought supermarkets and farmers' markets to traditionally underserved inner-city neighborhoods.Judy Wicks, founder of the White Dog Café in Philadelphia, which helped spark the locavore movement in that city more than 20 years ago, called the Reinvestment Fund and the Food Trust crucial tools for supporting sustainable agriculture in the region. "You need slow money to produce slow food," says Wicks, who also serves as board chair of the Business Alliance for Local Living Economies, an alliance of 80 local business networks in the United States and Canada. "If we want to grow community-based food systems, we need long-term, patient investment capital."Wicks practices what she preaches: More than 10 years ago, she sold all the stock in her portfolio-including blue chip companies like McDonald's-and bought into the Reinvestment Fund. "My return is anywhere from 4.5 to 5.5 percent," she says. "I get the same return every year, and I just reinvest it."Philadelphia's fund is still an anomaly, however. In most areas, such investment hubs need to be built from the ground up. To get the ball rolling, Tasch has spent the last several months touring the country, hosting a series of day-long "Slow Money Institutes" that have drawn hundreds of enthusiastic investors, donors, and local food entrepreneurs.Still, the prospect of pulling large amount of money out of the stock market to invest in, say, an organic soybean farm, has been met with some trepidation. "The word ‘scary' often comes up," says Tasch.Yet these fears may be overblown, particularly if Tasch's Slow Money funds are able to quickly ramp up in size. The greater the number of investors, the more diffuse the risk."If you have all your money invested with Joe the Farmer and he goes bankrupt, then you've lost your money," says Craig Wichner, managing director of Farmland LP, a San Francisco-based private equity firm that acquires conventional farmland and converts it to sustainable organic farmland. "If you have all your money invested with 100 farmers, you have portfolio risk."While support for the Slow Money movement remains small, it is not without its influential backers. George Siemon, the CEO of Organic Valley, is a founding member and investor who believes that Tasch's vision of investing in local agriculture is an idea whose time has come. "All you hear about now is local food systems," says Siemon. "There's been a shift back to that kind of old-world perspective." As the chief executive at the largest organic farming cooperative in the United States, with $527 million in sales in 2008, Siemon's support could help convince other deep-pocketed investors that Tasch's Slow Money cooperatives are a bet worth making.But the key to success for such investment co-ops will be careful vetting of which enterprises to fund, Siemon says. Businesses will have to be judged not only on their individual merits, but also on how they will work in the context of a larger local food network. "They're going to have to be awfully cautious," he says.Still, the principles of Slow Money investing have merit beyond their application to local food systems, Siemon believes. He credits Tasch with questioning traditional paradigms of investing that, in spite of the recent financial meltdown, remain unchallenged by most industry professionals, and by extension, the investing public. Such questions are simple, but potentially revolutionary."Shouldn't we invest our money in things that reflect our values?" Siemon asks.Illustrations by Tucker Nichols.