Dr. Chris Cavacuiti, a Toronto physician who cycles competitively, started doing some research into how most bike-versus-car collisions happen while recovering from a nasty bike-versus-car collision. His findings:While there is a public perception that cyclists are usually the cause of accidents between cars and bikes, an analysis of Toronto police collision reports shows otherwise: The most common type of crash in this study involved a motorist entering an intersection and either failing to stop properly or proceeding before it was safe to do so. The second most common crash type involved a motorist overtaking unsafely. The third involved a motorist opening a door onto an oncoming cyclist. The study concluded that cyclists are the cause of less than 10 percent of bike-car accidents in this study.I can find that pretty easy to believe, actually. In most cities-and certainly in Los Angeles-cars rule the road. So drivers are attuned to check against potential car-car accidents but don't think as much about potential car-bike accidents. When you park your car on the street you might check your side-view mirror for cars before you open your door, but you'd be less likely to check your rear-view mirror for cyclists coming up behind you. Also, you just generally feel more exposed and focused on a bike than in a car, so you're more careful.What's way more perplexing to me is this animosity between "cyclists" and "drivers" as if we don't all do a little of both.Via TreeHugger. The pic up there is a Ghost Bike.
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
The Latest
Most Popular
Sign Up for
The Daily GOOD!
Get our free newsletter delivered to your inbox