This article first appeared on Common Dreams. You can find it here.
The Tax Amazon movement claimed “a historic victory for working people” on Monday when Seattle’s city council passed a new tax on big businesses to fund local economic relief.
The Amazon Tax is a historic victory for working people and the result of determined class struggle by a democratically-organized grassroots campaign. Our movement is beating Jeff Bezos (again)!#TaxAmazon#WhenWeFightWeWinpic.twitter.com/rwrbfqGDAv— Tax Amazon (@TaxAmazonMvt) July 7, 2020
The vote on the JumpStart Seattle plan, proposed last month by Councilmember Teresa Mosqueda, was a veto-proof 7-2. The plan targets corporations with payrolls of $7 million or more and employees with salaries above $150,000, with the measure expected to generate at least $200 million a year. The tax rate corporations would pay ranges from 0.7% to 2.4%. The highest rate—which would affect Seattle-based Amazon—would hit businesses with payrolls of at least $1 billion with salaries of $500,000 per year.
Mosqueda has framed the progressive tax plan as “part of the medicine to address both” the public health crisis and economic crisis, referring to the coronavirus pandemic and resulting damage to the local economy. The revenue generated would fund homelessness prevention programs and rental assistance, immigrant and refugee supports, food security programs, and assistance for small businesses.
“Seattle residents have made it clear—now is not the time for government austerity or divisiveness,” Mosqueda said in a statement following the vote.
“We are in the midst of a health and economic crisis that even a strong economy like Seattle may not be able to recover from quickly,” said Mosqueda, pointing to the fact that “over a million people statewide… have filed for unemployment this year; countless businesses shuttered temporarily and some potentially forever; our immigrant and refugee families have been left out of federal aid, and our homeless neighbors continue to suffer in our streets in the midst of a global pandemic.”
Mosqueda said the proposal would live up to its name because it would “jump start our recovery with a relief plan that centers workers, small businesses, and our most vulnerable community members.”
In 2018, the city council passed a so-called “head tax” on large companies—including Amazon—to generate $47 million a year only to see the measure repealed weeks later following a well-funded opposition effort, of which Amazon was at the forefront. Councilmember Kshama Sawant at the time dubbed the repeal a “cowardly betrayal of the needs of the working people.”
Following the new progressive tax proposal’s passage Monday, Sawant thanked the movement that made it possible, giving props to “the thousands of working people, unions, socialists!” Sawant also expressed hope that Seattle’s action could be a model for other cities to follow.
Our Tax Amazon movement has made history!
Seattle City Council just voted to pass an Amazon Tax on the largest corporations to fund affordable housing & jobs, to begin to end racist gentrification.
This is entirely because of the thousands of working people, unions, socialists!— Kshama Sawant (@cmkshama) July 7, 2020
Working people & our movement have to unapologetically claim victory for what we've won, because we want to spread these victories to other cities & build on them for future struggles, and for that, sharing the lessons of how we actually won is critical.https://t.co/xe3fLfjVVA— Kshama Sawant (@cmkshama) July 7, 2020
Councilmember Tammy Morales also said JumpStart could be a model, tweeting: “The Seattle City Council is boldly leading to create a more equitable way to finance public services. And we challenge elected officials at the state level to join us in choosing investment over austerity.”
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) welcomed the vote as well. “In a city with so much wealth and yet one of the most regressive tax systems, progressive taxation is desperately needed,” she tweeted.
“To the big businesses that oppose this: understand that the economic injustice disproportionately hurting Black and brown communities is systemic,” Jayapal added. “If you truly believe #BlackLivesMatter, these are the kinds of structural changes that must be adopted to combat racism and inequality.”
Like over 101,000 people in the United States, retired grocery store manager Tim Andrews needed a kidney transplant. He had stage 3 kidney failure and had a heart attack after nine months of dialysis. In short, he was dying and was told it would take five years until he was at the top of the list for a kidney transplant.
He found that doctors needed a willing patient for an experimental surgery. Andrews eagerly volunteered. That’s how Andrews went under the knife to replace his failing organ with a pig kidney.
Andrews would be testing a xenotransplantation operation, a procedure that replaces human organs with modified animal ones. The animal organ is gene-edited to prevent the human immune system from rejecting the transplant. Andrews would be the fourth person to undergo a procedure to see if a gene-edited pig kidney would effectively keep him alive.
Andrews’ life-changing decision
To him, the decision to undergo this experimental operation was easy. He mostly slept between dialysis appointments, unable to walk or keep food down. He figured that he had little to lose by becoming a test subject.
“I’m gonna die anyways, why wouldn’t I do something for all these [other people with kidney disease] that are suffering?” Andrews told USA Today. He recalled telling his doctor, “I don’t care if I die the next day as long as you learn something.”
Andrews figured that, at best, this procedure would buy him some time; his physicians felt the same. Surviving the operation was a success, but Andrews did more than that. He thrived.
The pig kidney gamble paid off
After recovering from surgery, Andrews started to regularly cook and vacuum his home. He went on long walks with his dog. He even got the opportunity to throw the first pitch at a Boston Red Sox game with his family. Andrews wasn’t just surviving; he was living.
“I was alive, and I hadn’t been in a long time,” Andrews told CNN.
Andrews blew past all previous records for surviving a pig kidney transplant, just shy of nine months. Unfortunately, the immunosuppressive drugs Andrews took to help his body tolerate the pig kidney no longer worked. He would have to have it removed and return to dialysis.
While a person could obviously feel discouraged, Andrews was grateful for the additional time he was given off dialysis. He was also grateful to the pig and the organ, both of which he affectionately nicknamed “Wilma,” for being a partner. He praised the pig for not only extending his life but also helping create medical history.
“Wilma the genetically edited pig is a major part of this medical breakthrough and a major part of my soul as long as I live,” Andrews wrote on Facebook, according to CNN. “I LOVE YOU WILMA! Donate a Kidney and be a HERO!”
A new donor renews hope
This could have been where Andrews’ story ends, but Wilma bought him enough time for another chapter. Andrews got to the top of the kidney transplant recipient list, and his doctors found a perfect human match. Andrews was just as grateful for the human kidney transplant as he was to Wilma.
“When a human has to die for you to live, that’s a lot of responsibility,” he told USA Today.
While approaching life with humor, Andrews has promised to “preach” for organ donation for the rest of the days he is given. He’s grateful to continue on for a while longer, enjoying life with his family.
Thanks to Andrews taking the chance and potentially sacrificing whatever life he had left, scientists are closer to having permanent pig organ transplants when human donations are scarce. For now, though, there is consideration of using xenotransplantation as a bridge between dialysis and human kidney transplants in the near future.
Research suggests that pet ownership is associated with higher life satisfaction, with some studies estimating its impact as comparable to that of a substantial increase in income. According to the paper The Value of Pets by Michael W. Gmeiner and Adelina Gschwandtner, this comparison reflects a modeled relationship between life satisfaction and income rather than a literal financial gain.
Beyond the obvious companionship and social benefits, having a dog (or any other pet) waiting for you at home can also improve your health. Studies show that just 10 minutes of petting a dog while making eye contact can significantly reduce stress levels.
The growing body of research is convincing enough that more U.S. health professionals are beginning to recommend pet ownership as part of treatment plans.
Pink Papyrus explores research on the health benefits of pet ownership and why some professionals recommend it.
Why Are Health Professionals ‘Prescribing’ Pets?
A recent Human Animal Bond Research Institute (HABRI) report found that 1 in 5 pet owners say a doctor or therapist has recommended pet ownership to support their health. This reflects patient-reported experiences rather than a direct measure of how widely health professionals recommend pets.
The Science Behind the Data
Petting a dog for five to 10 minutes triggers the release of oxytocin, also known as the love hormone. At the same time, cortisol (the primary stress hormone) levels drop, leaving you feeling calmer and happier.
The effect goes both ways: dogs also experience increased oxytocin levels during petting. And if you make eye contact with your pet while stroking their fur, the feeling of calm and general positivity can be even stronger.
A study meta-analysis by the American Heart Association also shows that dog owners have a 31% lower risk of mortality from cardiovascular disease compared to those who don’t own dogs. This is largely due to increased physical activity (walks, play, grooming) and lower autonomic stress.
Dog Walks Help Combat Loneliness
Dog walks are great for more than just getting your daily steps; they’re a natural way to meet other dog owners and spend time outside, surrounded by people. For anyone feeling a bit isolated, that alone can make a real difference.
Dog walking has quietly become a gateway into online communities, where people share routines, tips, and even creative spins on their daily outings.
One trend that’s gained traction among more style-conscious pet parents is coordinating outfits with their dogs using playful accessories. Some brands have helped fuel this movement, turning a simple walk into a form of self-expression and something people love to share and bond over online.
Emotional Support Animals
While any pet can be an emotional support animal, dogs are usually on the front lines. These are not service dogs, trained to perform specific activities; their job is to provide therapeutic benefit through their presence alone.
Due to our deep bond, dogs can act as a physiological regulator. Besides petting and mutual gazing, many owners practice deep pressure therapy, in which the dog lies across the owner’s lap or chest. This weight triggers the parasympathetic nervous system, helping to ground a person during a panic attack or high-anxiety episode.
Furthermore, the daily routine of feeding, walking, grooming, bathroom breaks, etc., is beneficial for people who struggle with depression or anxiety. If you don’t have the motivation to get out of bed in the morning, you will do it for your dog.
Seniors also feel that their pets provide a sense of purpose, which helps keep both mind and body engaged. Having a pet depend on you can provide a powerful sense of self-worth.
The $22B Answer
Further research from HABRI highlights another angle: the economic impact on the U.S. healthcare system. According to its latest report, pet ownership saves an estimated $22.7 billion annually in medical costs.
On average, pet owners visit the doctor less frequently. Dog owners, in particular, tend to be more physically active, contributing to lower rates of obesity and cardiovascular disease.
The benefits extend beyond physical health. Many seniors find meaningful companionship in their pets or use them as a bridge to connect with other pet owners, helping reduce the risks associated with social isolation. Veterans living with PTSD also benefit from emotional support animals, which can lower long-term treatment costs.
A Healthier, Less Lonely Future
Pets play a meaningful role in our well-being. As both companions and sources of emotional support, they deliver proven benefits for physical and mental health.
The data also points to a measurable impact on public health. That said, these benefits depend on responsible ownership. Health professionals must weigh the advantages against an individual’s ability to provide a stable home and consistent veterinary care.
As Americans increasingly report feeling overwhelmed by daily life, many are using self-care to cope. Conversations and social media feeds are saturated with the language of “me time,” burnout, boundaries and nervous system regulation.
To meet this demand, the wellness industry has grown into a multitrillion-dollar global market. Myriad providers offer products, services and lifestyle prescriptions that promise calm, balance and restoration.
Paradoxically, though, even as interest in self-care continues to grow, Americans’ mental health is getting worse.
I am a professor of public health who studies health behaviors and the gap between intentions and outcomes. I became interested in this self-care paradox recently, after I suffered from a concussion. I was prescribed two months of strictly screen-free cognitive rest – no television, email, Zooming, social media, streaming or texting.
The benefits were almost immediate, and they surprised me. I slept better, had a longer attention span and had a newfound sense of mental quiet. These effects reflected a well-established principle in neuroscience: When cognitive and emotional stimuli decrease, the brain’s regulatory systems can recover from overload and chronic stress.
Obviously, most people can’t go 100% screen-free for days, much less months, but the underlying principle offers a powerful lesson for practicing effective self-care.
Chronic disease patterns mirror this strain. When daily stress becomes chronic, it can trigger biological changes that increase the risk of long-term conditions like heart disease and diabetes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that 6 in 10 U.S. adults live with at least one chronic condition, and 4 in 10 live with multiple chronic conditions.
How people try to cope
Many Americans say they actively practice self-care in everyday life. For example, they describe taking mental health days, protecting personal time, setting boundaries around work and prioritizing rest and leisure.
The problem lies in how they use that leisure time.
Over the past 22 years, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ American Time Use Survey has consistently found that watching television is the most popular leisure activity for U.S. adults. Americans spend far more time watching TV than exercising, spending time with friends or practicing reflection through activities like yoga. Other common self-care activities include watching movies and gaming.
Modern leisure time increasingly includes smartphone use. Surveys suggest that mobile phones have become the dominant screen for many Americans, with adults spending several hours per day on their phones.
For many adults, checking social media or watching short videos has become a default relaxation behavior layered on top of traditional screen use. This practice is often referred to as second screening.
Although many people turn to screen-based activities to wind down, these activities may have the opposite effect biologically.
Why modern screen use feels different
Pre-internet forms of leisure often involved activities such as watching scheduled television programs, listening to radio broadcasts or reading books and magazines. For all of these pastimes, the content followed a predictable sequence with natural stopping points.
Today’s digital media environment looks very different. People routinely engage with multiple screens at once, respond to frequent notifications and switch rapidly between several streams of content. These environments continuously require users to split their attention, engage their emotions and make decisions.
Modern digital platforms are designed to maximize engagement. Algorithms tend to prioritize emotionally arousing content, particularly anger, anxiety and outrage. These feelings drive clicks, sharing and time spent on platforms. Research has shown that this design is associated with higher stress, distraction and cognitive load.
When ‘rest’ doesn’t restore
Against the backdrop of daily hassles and competing demands, it can feel like relief to flip on the TV. Practices such as streaming or so-called bed-rotting – spending extended periods in bed while scrolling – often are framed as a form of radical rest or self-care.
Other common coping behaviors include leaving the television on as background noise, scrolling between tasks throughout the day or using phones during meals and conversations. These strategies can feel restful because they temporarily reduce external demands and decision-making.
However, pairing rest with screen use may undermine the very restoration that people are seeking. Digital media stimulate attention, emotion and sensory processing. Even while people are sitting or lying still, being onscreen can keep their nervous systems in a heightened state of arousal. It may look like downtime, but it doesn’t create the biological conditions for restoration.
Unwind with analog or low-novelty activities, such as reading print, journaling, gentle movement or device-free walking. These pastimes allow mental engagement without overload.
The goal is to intentionally reduce mental load, not to abandon all digital devices.
To improve well-being in our overstimulated society, it’s important to understand the difference between feeling as though you are unwinding and actually allowing your brain and body to recover. In my view, fewer screens, fewer inputs, fewer emotional demands and more protected time for genuine cognitive rest are important components of an effective wellness strategy.
